What Conservatives Can Learn from Liberals

By Clay Olsen | April 15th, 2013

After the 2012 election, there has been, and continues to be, much talk about the state of the Republican Party. Countless ideas are being thrown around about how the party can make a good rebound. Some of these ideas suggest Republicans should continue to move toward the center to get the coveted prize of the “undecided” vote. Others propose that a party revival is needed in which Republicans return to Conservative principles and make their stand there. One thing is agreed upon by all Republican strategists: we cannot afford to strike out next time we are at bat.

Perhaps it is appropriate to look back on past elections in order to gauge what works and what does not. Election 2012 is a good place to start. The results of this election should have been something Democrats feared. An economy going nowhere, huge debt and deficits, and the recent foreign policy foul up in Benghazi are some tough facts to run on. However, the GOP could not deliver. We saw a lower than expected Republican turnout at the voting booth.

Now let’s look at the 2010 Congressional elections. Similar situation: out of control spending, Democrats calling for higher taxes, and the controversial Affordable Care Act (sometimes referred to as Obamacare). We saw huge support for Republican candidates resulting in many seats going in the party’s favor.

So we have two very similar circumstances with two very different results. What was the difference between the 2010 and 2012 election? Conservatism. Although establishment Republicans want to downplay the Tea Party movement, it was this movement that brought the GOP majority in the House. Marches on D.C. before the election fired up the Republican party and showed how popular fiscal Conservatism really is to its constituents. The Tea Party was built on the principles of lower taxes, lower government spending, and the repeal of Obamacare. And that was popular! So why do establishment Republicans run from it?!

The GOP had two years to retain the Conservative excitement. Instead of going with an exciting candidate, the party decided to go with (once again) a moderate. Now I am not saying there was a clear Conservative candidate that was a guarantee win, but we tried out a moderate Republican in the 2008 election and we lost. Romney was supposed to collect the “undecided” vote. That is what elections today seem to be all about: the all-important “undecided” vote. The undecided vote means nothing if you cannot get your own party involved and out to vote on election day.

We are told that political strategy leads politicians to capture the fence-line voters by moderating their stances. In other words, pandering. We are told that we need to soften our principles and move toward the middle. And that is what we have done the past two presidential elections. We put up two weak Republicans to represent us and they expect to retain the same enthusiasm from the conservative Republicans that they got in the 2010 election? If the candidate that is supposed to be representing your principles and ideas goes out and sucks up to “Independents” in order to get votes, does that make you want to get involved in the guy’s campaign?

Pandering shows weakness. Nobody will willingly get behind someone who is not going to protect their principles. There was no pandering in 2010. There was only the unwavering stance on the principle of limited government. So what is to be done about the undecided voter. Do we all get down off our platform to convince them that we are not fanatical? I would suggest that the correct answer is to educate the undecided. Educate every voter. Make sure that every voter, no matter what party they are affiliated with, understands what we stand for. We cannot leave it up to the cable television networks that create a straw man of the Republican party.

How do we educate? How do we get people involved in the campaign? Maybe a good way to answer these questions is to take a look at how Democrats/Liberals get their voters involved and excited. What I do not see in Democratic campaigns is a change in their ideas in the general election in order to get the undecided vote. They lay out what they believe and say why you should support them. Very simple. They stick with their ideas, and their supporters, in return, stick with the party. People tend to throw more support on movements that are consistent.

The Republicans need to stick to their platform so that they are not perceived as weak and inconsistent. Republicans sometimes do not produce the best sound bites, and the media do a great job of playing those clips over and over again. We need to speak our message in a straightforward manner, respectfully, and without controversy.

It is somewhat against the nature of the Conservative to become more involved in government or politics in general. The Conservative wants less government in the lives of individuals. Therefore, it will be harder for Republicans to get constituent involvement, but it is possible. The Conservative must get involved in our system of government. It is the Liberal that attacks the founding conservative principles, and it is up to the Conservative to defend those principles.

So the answer is quite clear. It is not to delude the party. It is to return to principle Conservatism. Look at the rising stars of the party today: Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, among others. Conservatives that have huge support. We need leaders like these to express our platform. We stand for the hard working individual and we want them to have the opportunity to achieve their goals. We stand for growth. Not growth of the government. Growth of the private sector. We do not want the money in Washington. We want it in the pockets of Americans.

Alexander the Great has an interesting quote concerning leadership: “I’m not afraid of an army of lions led by a lamb; I’m afraid by an army of lambs led by a lion.” That is what the Republican party has become in presidential elections: an army of lions led by a lamb. This party has a great opportunity: to be an army of lions led by a lion.

About texascrs

Best Party on Camps since 1950 ~

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s